<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>Soap Box</title>
        <link>http://cadred.net/blog/category/13.aspx</link>
        <description>Soap Box</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Michael Cook</copyright>
        <managingEditor>cadred@cadred.net</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 2.0.0.0</generator>
        <item>
            <title>It's Better to Rob Peter than Download Paul... Or something</title>
            <link>http://cadred.net/blog/archive/2005/02/11/254.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;a target="_top" href="http://offtheshelf.nowis.com/index.cfm?ID=5"&gt;Karl Wagenfuehr points out&lt;/a&gt; the laughably disproportionate penalties for downloading movies versus actually stealing them:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;For stealing the DVD you could face no more than up to 1 year
imprisonment and up to a $100,000 fine; for downloading the same
material you could face statutory damages of up to $3,300,000, costs
and attorney's fees (ie: the other guy's attorneys), as well as up to 1
year imprisonment, and up to a $100,000 fine...Am I alone in thinking there is something really, really wrong here?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
No, no you're not.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://cadred.net/blog/aggbug/254.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Michael Cook</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://cadred.net/blog/archive/2005/02/11/254.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2005 04:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://cadred.net/blog/comments/254.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://cadred.net/blog/archive/2005/02/11/254.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://cadred.net/blog/comments/commentRss/254.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Snoozer Bowl</title>
            <link>http://cadred.net/blog/archive/2005/02/08/253.aspx</link>
            <description>This year's SuperBowl HalfTime show was easily the least memorable in
history. When you remove the absolute possibility of anything exciting
happening you get dry, boring, entertainment free television. Nothing,
absolutely nothing unexpected happened, no Ringo, no special guest
stars. Hell I wouldn't have minded Britney Spears butchering some Wings, at least it would have been &lt;i&gt;interesting&lt;/i&gt;. It's like they didn't even try.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Nothing against Paul McCartney mind you, he's a great musician and seems like a great guy,
but a 12 minute excerpt of a P.M. concert with 20 years old songs is
not SuperBowl worthy TV, it's not even PrimeTime TV. It's something I would expect to see on a Time-Life
infomercial at 3AM. Lame.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'll take Janet Jackson's left breast over Paul McCartney every time
(sorry Paul). Perhaps you'll offend a few people who's sense of reality
can be shattered by a partially clothed black woman, but it's worth it
for great Television. You can't go wrong with tits.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cadred.net/blog/aggbug/253.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Michael Cook</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://cadred.net/blog/archive/2005/02/08/253.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 11:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://cadred.net/blog/comments/253.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://cadred.net/blog/archive/2005/02/08/253.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://cadred.net/blog/comments/commentRss/253.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>"I'm surrounded by Assholes" - Dark Helmet</title>
            <link>http://cadred.net/blog/archive/2004/07/21/206.aspx</link>
            <description>Well don't I feel special, I've officially been&amp;nbsp;blogging long enough to get comment spam! Yaaaay! I mean Boooo! Hopefully the next version of .Text will address this issue (here's hoping), I already have plenty of viagra and penis enlargement pills.&lt;img src="http://cadred.net/blog/aggbug/206.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Michael Cook</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://cadred.net/blog/archive/2004/07/21/206.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://cadred.net/blog/comments/206.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://cadred.net/blog/archive/2004/07/21/206.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://cadred.net/blog/comments/commentRss/206.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Required Reading</title>
            <link>http://cadred.net/blog/archive/2004/06/23/196.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;A href="mailto:cory@eff.org"&gt;Cory Doctorow&lt;/A&gt; from the &lt;A href="http://eff.org/"&gt;EFF&lt;/A&gt; has put up a &lt;A href="http://craphound.com/msftdrm.txt"&gt;transcription from a talk on DRM he recently presented at Microsoft&lt;/A&gt;. It is a very eloquent explanation of exactly why DRM (Digital Rights Management) is bad for artists, publishers, software makers, society as a whole, and why it plain won't work.&lt;img src="http://cadred.net/blog/aggbug/196.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Michael Cook</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://cadred.net/blog/archive/2004/06/23/196.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://cadred.net/blog/comments/196.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://cadred.net/blog/archive/2004/06/23/196.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://cadred.net/blog/comments/commentRss/196.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>